From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: matthias@urlichs.de Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 9c371b21 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 08:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from netz.smurf.noris.de (netz.smurf.noris.de [213.95.21.43]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 907d9f1f for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 08:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2001:780:107:a:225:22ff:feb1:a353] by netz.extern.smurf.noris.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eFc1t-0005iu-U1 for wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 08:29:43 +0000 Subject: Re: Request: Optional "Comment" [Peer] entry To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com References: <1510826689.1349863.1174432192.27EE87E6@webmail.messagingengine.com> <7777F2EF-1D1B-4403-91C6-FB4A36C92CC5@lonnie.abelbeck.com> <1510906834.6309.77.camel@gmx.de> From: Matthias Urlichs Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 09:29:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1510906834.6309.77.camel@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 17.11.2017 09:20, Manuel Schölling wrote: > You could also use it for naming peers, i.e. using "Peer-(?P[A-Za-z0-9\-]+)". The usual way is to use a space as separator, i.e. [Peer uplink] This solves the naming issue. Nevertheless, a Comment= entry would also be a good idea. Also, after adding names we should use them as primary peer identifiers, instead of their pubkeys. -- -- Matthias Urlichs