Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jörg Thalheim" <joerg@higgsboson.tk>
To: Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch>
Cc: "wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com" <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] treewide: more portable bash shebangs
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 23:08:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c58e3e33-bf95-1154-bfe2-7b87e4e730c7@higgsboson.tk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YKHm3E7XFkL3dPRaVjHwiURlLU4Q1SCJxWCu4j40Fd1TGco-rzr6XXAJ5I_kjb8H2X_vp5NgKz8EBBOpWqIDE8COgWd4aipFzmbiCaCtLbQ=@protonmail.ch>

On 16/07/2019 18.32, Jordan Glover wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 16, 2019 12:21 PM, Jörg Thalheim <joerg@higgsboson.tk> wrote:
>
>> While /usr/bin/env is more or less available on all POSIX systems
>> /bin/bash might not be. This is particular the case on NixOS and the BSD
>> family (/usr/local/bin/bash). Downstream packagers would often rewrite
>> those shebangs back automatically as they can rely on absolute paths
>> but having portable shebangs in the repository helps to run the code
>> without any further modification.
>>
> The reason almost everyone hardcodes bash to /bin/bash is the potential
> environment attack where someone create malicious "bash" and export it in PATH:
>
> https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/OpenSource/Conceptual/ShellScripting/ShellScriptSecurity/ShellScriptSecurity.html
>
> Obviously wg scripts are handling quite sensitive data like private keys...
>
> Seriously if you except that downstream packagers would rewrite it back to
> /bin/bash then why the others can't rewrite it to /usr/bin/env bash right
> now if this is something they want?
>
> Jordan


This argument does not apply here since all commands internally could
be redirected by a PATH change as well since the PATH is not set in the scripts.
I am also not quite sure what threat model here is?
The scripts changed here are not designed to run from a CGI context
and are not hardened for that purpose.
The idea is that you can run the scripts unmodified from the repository
without having to alter the files, which is convenient for development w.r.t to git.
_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-16 22:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-16 12:21 Jörg Thalheim
2019-07-16 17:32 ` Jordan Glover
2019-07-16 20:07   ` Janne Johansson
2019-07-16 22:08   ` Jörg Thalheim [this message]
2019-07-17 17:32     ` Jordan Glover
2019-07-17 18:39       ` Jörg Thalheim
2019-07-17 18:52         ` Jordan Glover

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c58e3e33-bf95-1154-bfe2-7b87e4e730c7@higgsboson.tk \
    --to=joerg@higgsboson.tk \
    --cc=Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).