From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: jens@viisauksena.de Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 35955bf0 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 12:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from viisauksena.de (v32412.1blu.de [178.254.39.111]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 9c7b6a82 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 12:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.147] (p579A7586.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.154.117.134]) by v32412.1blu.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 238362070B for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 13:19:01 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [WireGuard] Pull-based peer configuration References: <20161122130805.GG20343@tuxmachine.polynome.dn42> To: WireGuard mailing list From: jens Message-ID: Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 13:18:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 22.11.2016 17:31, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > But it does add _just a tiny little bit_ of extra complexity, which > can quickly snowball into something dreadful. My general plan for > these more enterprise-centric features is to wait until after the > initial codebase is merged into mainline. just a small comment, freifunk a like we would love to see something like this, but are also happy to wait a while - because we are used to prefilled lists/configs with valid keys. this would make things a lot easier. ;) thx -- make the world nicer, please use PGP encryption