From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-3486-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 21779 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2000 13:05:42 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Oct 2000 13:05:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 29925 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2000 13:05:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 3486
Received: (qmail 29918 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2000 13:05:23 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de)
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
To: "Akim Demaille" <akim@epita.fr>, <zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: RE: Trap and exit
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:05:20 +0400
Message-ID: <000201c04016$8f505a80$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <mv4d7gm8n7v.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400


> 
> 
> | OTOH both sh and ksh here behave the same as Zsh. Unless there are
> | compatibility reasons, I still prefer sh/bash.
> 
> What implementation are you referring to?  What do you call `ksh' and
> `sh' here?
> 

ReliantUNIX 5.44 :-) (known as SINIX before)  ksh 88: Version 11/16/88i

And I meant ash/bash, of course.

-andrej