From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-3043-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 16793 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2000 13:54:59 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Apr 2000 13:54:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 17883 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2000 13:54:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 3043
Received: (qmail 17870 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2000 13:54:18 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de)
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
To: <zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk>
Subject: RE: Q about new completion (how to create several match sets)
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 17:51:42 +0400
Message-ID: <000801bfb04f$b836fe60$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <200004271105.NAA14323@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de>

>
> > In current form _configure completes both --with-option
> > and --without-option in one shot. It means, that I always
> get at least
> > two matches and (in my settings) cursor is placed after
> --with so I have
> > to use additional keystroke to jump to the end of line.
>
> Hm, this is ugly, but should it be enough to keep from
> supplying match
> specs?
>

No. In this case I obviously do want to use match specs )to be able to
complete --w-f-b-c).

>
> Sure:
>
>   zstyle ':completion:*:*:configure:*' tag-order \
>       'options:-with:with\ options options:-other:other\ options' \
>       'options:-without:without\ options'
>   zstyle ':completion:*:options-with' ignored-patterns '^--with-*'
>   zstyle ':completion:*:options-without' ignored-patterns
> '^--without-*'
>   zstyle ':completion:*:options-other' ignored-patterns
> '--with(|out)-*'
>
> (Hmmmmm, tag labels. ;-)
>
> This says to first complete options two times, once using the tag
> `options-with' and once using the tag `options-other'. The
> ignored-patterns for these tags then make sure that you don't get the
> `--without-*' options. The second value of the tag-order
> style says to
> complete options using the tag `options-without' and there the
> ignored-patterns says that only the `--without-*' options are to be
> completed.
>

No, that's weird. I was able to make it running exactly once - and I
have a feeling, this was after cvs update/make/make install in one
window, sourcing styles in another one and trying there (that is, with
*old* zsh+functions). What I get currently, is

bor@itsrm2% cd samba-2.0.7/source
bor@itsrm2% ./configure --wi-swTAB
bor@itsrm2% cd samba-2.0.7/source
bor@itsrm2% ./configure --with-<CURSOR HERE>swatdir
Completing with options
--with-swatdir
Completing other options
--with-swatdir      --without-swatdir

with styles

bor@itsrm2% zstyle -L
zstyle ':completion:*' completer _oldlist _complete _match
zstyle ':completion:*' format 'Completing %d'
zstyle ':completion:*' group-name ''
zstyle ':completion:*' ignore-parents parent pwd
zstyle ':completion:*' insert-unambiguous true
zstyle ':completion:*' list-colors ''
zstyle ':completion:*' list-prompt 'Showing %l'
zstyle ':completion:*' match-original both
zstyle ':completion:*' matcher-list '' 'm:{a-z}={A-Z}' 'r:|[._-]=*
r:|=*' 'r:|[._-]=** r:|=**'
zstyle ':completion:*' menu 'select=0'
zstyle ':completion:*' original true
zstyle ':completion:*' verbose true
zstyle ':completion:*' old-list _match
zstyle ':completion:*:*:configure:*' tag-order 'options:-with:with\
options options:-other:other\ options' 'options:-without:without\
options'
zstyle ':completion:*:options-with' ignored-patterns '^--with-*'
zstyle ':completion:*:options-without' ignored-patterns '^--without-*'
zstyle ':completion:*:options-other' ignored-patterns '^--with(|out)-*'

(I added ``^'' to the last pattern - assuming, it is beginning-of-word
anchor)

+ setopt nolistambiguous in .zshrc

>
> I'm not completely sure that I know what you mean by `select
> either of
> them', but of course completing after `--without-' will take the
> matches from the second set because in the first one nothing matches,
> and then there is _next_tags, bound to ^Xn to go to the next set of
> tags in the tag-order style.
>

Yes, that was it.

-andrej