From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12160 invoked from network); 3 Sep 1999 09:45:39 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 3 Sep 1999 09:45:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 4562 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 1999 09:45:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 2562 Received: (qmail 4555 invoked from network); 3 Sep 1999 09:45:20 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer david.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Bart Schaefer" , Subject: RE: different kind of glob_complete? Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 13:45:16 +0400 Message-ID: <001a01bef5f1$06ee3330$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <990903093156.ZM25241@candle.brasslantern.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 > > } We could add an option to allow this for it, but should we? Or may > } this be an incentive to go to the new completion system? > > Does the setting (or not) of globcomplete have any effect at all on the > behavior of the new system? > Yes. At least to the extent, that with globcomplete menucompletion is started immediately. Without globcomplete you can use _match and configure it to start or not to start menucopletion. As I understand, with globcomplete set _match will never even get a single chance. /andrej