From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 567 invoked from network); 17 May 2000 10:07:43 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 17 May 2000 10:07:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 20976 invoked by alias); 17 May 2000 10:07:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 3070 Received: (qmail 20969 invoked from network); 17 May 2000 10:07:24 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000517100715.ZM11146@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 10:07:15 +0000 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to Joachim Knoke "NumLock not working on Solaris with access from exceed" (May 17, 2:54am) References: X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Joachim Knoke , zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: NumLock not working on Solaris with access from exceed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On May 17, 2:54am, Joachim Knoke wrote: } Subject: NumLock not working on Solaris with access from exceed } } However yesterday i was told that coming from NT with excedd (from } hummingbird) the Numlock function and typing with the numeric keypad does } not work. The same configuration does work with /bin/sh and /bin/ksh. "Does not work" can mean a whole lot of things. What DOES happen? Nothing? Strange characters appear? Something else? } I searched the FAQ, but did not find anything about this. Is it a } misconfiguration, am I missing something or is this completely unknown to } you? I don't believe this particular problem has ever been reported before, but it may be related to (missing) key bindings in some way. Another possibility: Does the output of "stty -a" differ in /bin/ksh with numlock, as compared to zsh in the same state? How does it differ? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com