From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8663 invoked from network); 29 May 2000 10:05:59 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 May 2000 10:05:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 21304 invoked by alias); 29 May 2000 10:05:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 3094 Received: (qmail 21297 invoked from network); 29 May 2000 10:05:20 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1000529100459.ZM1282@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 10:04:58 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200005290835.KAA03954@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "Re: Menu-completion for particular commands" (May 29, 10:35am) References: <200005290835.KAA03954@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Sven Wischnowsky , zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: Menu-completion for particular commands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On May 29, 10:35am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: Re: Menu-completion for particular commands } } > > zsh% zstyle ':completion::complete:(g|)vim::default' menu true } > This didn't work immediately. ':completion:*:(g|)vim:*' did, though. } } Yep. The default tag is tested at the very beginning, when almost } nothing of the context is set up. In that case the discussion of `default' under doc for the `menu' style is, at least, misleading. Shouldn't it be removed from that paragraph and discussed more genearally somewhere earlier? (Perhaps lengthen the explanation under "Standard Tags" a bit?) -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net