From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29645 invoked from network); 14 May 2002 00:50:32 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 14 May 2002 00:50:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 24597 invoked by alias); 14 May 2002 00:50:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 4967 Received: (qmail 24586 invoked from network); 14 May 2002 00:50:18 -0000 From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <1020514005004.ZM12670@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 00:50:04 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20020513211550.GP963@eumel.yoo.net> Comments: In reply to Thorsten Haude "Speed" (May 13, 11:15pm) References: <20020513211550.GP963@eumel.yoo.net> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Thorsten Haude , Zsh User ML Subject: Re: Speed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On May 13, 11:15pm, Thorsten Haude wrote: } } I just go through my /etc/zshenv, see all this setopts and wonder how } much difference is these in terms of speed: A single command is almost always faster than a series of equivalent commands. However, the amount of work necessary to set options is so small that it'd likely take at least hundreds if not thousands of executions before you'd notice it. Even with the proliferation of options in 4.x, there just aren't enough of them for this to matter. There might be other things in your startup files that are slowing down initialization, but setopts are not likely to be it. } Another thing: Are the keycodes ("^[!" and stuff) documented somewhere? If you mean the key *bindings*, then yes; you can find it in `man zshzle' or `info zsh "zsh line editor"'. Look in the section about "Zle Widgets" under the sub-heading "Standard Widgets". If you mean something else, you'll have to ask more specifically. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net