From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
To: Peter Stephenson <pws@csr.com>,
zsh-users@sunsite.dk, Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Completion function for bitkeeper?
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 16:12:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1031114161247.ZM2353@candle.brasslantern.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <644.1068806872@csr.com>
In-Reply-To: <22727.1068815359@gmcs3.local>
On Nov 14, 10:47am, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: Completion function for bitkeeper?
}
} Oliver Kiddle wrote:
} > For '*:desc:{_foo}' style actions, this is run:
} >
} > eval "$action[@]"
} >
} > and for '*:desc: _foo', this is run:
} >
} > eval "action=( $action )"
} > "$action[@]"
} >
} > Can anyone tell me what practical difference that makes, if any?
Word splitting is vastly different in the two cases. It happens within
the words of $action in the second case, but does not in the first case.
Also in the second example, only "alias -g" aliases are expanded. Not
that I think that was the intended behavior, but ...
} I don't think we *need* both
Yes, we do. There are uses for that splitting behavior.
} What about a single unquoted space to indicate no matches? Why do we
} need the space at all? Surely if there's nothing there it indicates no
} possible matches? It's all a bit Zen-like.
There's a reason for that, too, but I'll have to dig in the archives a
bit to find it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-14 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-23 16:00 Steve Borho
2003-05-23 16:01 ` Danek Duvall
2003-11-06 15:32 ` Danek Duvall
2003-11-07 19:17 ` Oliver Kiddle
2003-11-10 18:20 ` Danek Duvall
2003-11-11 8:22 ` Oliver Kiddle
2003-11-11 10:42 ` Peter Stephenson
2003-11-11 15:21 ` Oliver Kiddle
2003-11-11 15:24 ` Peter Stephenson
2003-11-11 16:13 ` Oliver Kiddle
2003-11-11 16:23 ` Peter Stephenson
2003-11-11 16:44 ` Oliver Kiddle
2003-11-11 16:23 ` Danek Duvall
2003-11-11 19:06 ` Oliver Kiddle
2003-11-11 21:28 ` Danek Duvall
2003-11-14 8:04 ` Oliver Kiddle
2003-11-14 10:47 ` Peter Stephenson
2003-11-14 13:09 ` Oliver Kiddle
2003-11-14 16:12 ` Bart Schaefer [this message]
2003-11-14 16:23 ` Peter Stephenson
2003-11-14 17:14 ` Bart Schaefer
2003-11-14 17:01 ` Oliver Kiddle
2003-11-14 15:46 ` Danek Duvall
2003-11-14 21:24 ` Danek Duvall
2003-11-17 15:47 ` Oliver Kiddle
2003-11-17 17:51 ` Danek Duvall
2003-11-19 10:23 ` Oliver Kiddle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1031114161247.ZM2353@candle.brasslantern.com \
--to=schaefer@brasslantern.com \
--cc=okiddle@yahoo.co.uk \
--cc=pws@csr.com \
--cc=zsh-users@sunsite.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).