From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-6893-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 2045 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2003 18:08:33 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Dec 2003 18:08:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 6874 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2003 18:08:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 6893
Received: (qmail 6820 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2003 18:08:11 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 15 Dec 2003 18:08:11 -0000
X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk)
Received: from [4.11.8.53] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 15 Dec 2003 18:8:11 -0000
Received: (from schaefer@localhost)
	by candle.brasslantern.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id hBFI8Ae13035
	for zsh-users@sunsite.dk; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:08:10 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: candle.brasslantern.com: schaefer set sender to schaefer@closedmail.com using -f
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <1031215180809.ZM13032@candle.brasslantern.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:08:09 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20031213232313.GU18859@strindberg.dsv.su.se>
Comments: In reply to Jesper Holmberg <jesperh@dsv.su.se>
        "Re: Sort order" (Dec 14, 12:23am)
References: <20031213160239.GT18859@strindberg.dsv.su.se> 
	<1031213191527.ZM5307@candle.brasslantern.com> 
	<20031213232313.GU18859@strindberg.dsv.su.se>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97)
To: Zsh-users List <zsh-users@sunsite.dk>
Subject: Re: Sort order
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Dec 14, 12:23am, Jesper Holmberg wrote:
}
} > } LC_CTYPE=3Dsv_SE
} > } LC_COLLATE=3Dsv_SE
} > =

} > If you give the command
} > =

} > 	print -l *
} > =

} > do you see the files in same order that "ls" displays them, or in the=

} > same order that menu completion offers them?
} =

} So, print -l * gives the right order, but still menu-completion offers =
me
} the order l=E5re lare lere.

There appears to be a bug masquerading as an optimization in the file-sor=
t
style.

When either no ordering (style not set), or name ordering, is requested,
_path_files puts the names into a sorted group so that the completion
system reorders them internally, thereby bypassing the LC_COLLATE order.

If on the other hand you request any non-name ordering, or reverse name
ordering, then _path_files orders the names with globbing and puts them
into an unsorted group so that completion skips the internal reordering.