From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13745 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2004 19:01:23 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 21 Feb 2004 19:01:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 2198 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2004 19:00:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7079 Received: (qmail 2164 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2004 19:00:59 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Feb 2004 19:00:59 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [4.11.9.147] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 21 Feb 2004 19:0:58 -0000 Received: (from schaefer@localhost) by candle.brasslantern.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i1LJ0uv03954 for zsh-users@sunsite.dk; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:00:56 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: candle.brasslantern.com: schaefer set sender to schaefer@closedmail.com using -f From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <1040221190056.ZM3953@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 19:00:56 +0000 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to Thorsten Kampe "Re: incremental history search" (Feb 21, 4:50pm) References: <1lk8q9de9jvbv.dlg@thorstenkampe.de> <1epb3ga9oumiw$.dlg@thorstenkampe.de> <20040221143934.GB16036@teapot.iano-fletcher.org> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: zsh-users@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: incremental history search MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Feb 21, 4:50pm, Thorsten Kampe wrote: } } Both approaches are useful in certain cases but in my opinion the } dynamic movement to the end of the line is more useful because I } manipulate the end of commands more often than the beginning. See Functions/Zle/history-search-end in the standard distribution. There's even documentation for it in "man zshcontrib" (the "User Contributions" section of the info doc).