From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-16447-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 20924 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2011 14:20:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 16447
Received: (qmail 16 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2011 14:20:34 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <110927072015.ZM25125@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 07:20:15 -0700
In-reply-to:
 <CAJR5sYiP00oUMEBmKgV_76oiUD6BFNzxgGKpTgNvHwBjQQWy6g@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In reply to Ismail Donmez <ismail@namtrac.org>
 "Re: Interesting zsh behaviour regarding awk and backslash" (Sep 27,  3:54pm)
References:
 <CAJR5sYhgXzUiGn_BGHiULrqH_VZtxhNFFBVEc=F-tq5D+OZ74g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHYJk3RMadRdRKGLzhMEk1b1LhJzEuAjUdNnor2gpfNVGgf52A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJR5sYiP00oUMEBmKgV_76oiUD6BFNzxgGKpTgNvHwBjQQWy6g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: Zsh Users <zsh-users@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: Interesting zsh behaviour regarding awk and backslash
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Sep 27,  3:54pm, Ismail Donmez wrote:
}
} Thanks that works,  any reason this is not on by default for sh
} compatibility though?

Because zsh is quite deliberately not sh compatible by default?