From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-16737-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 3355 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2012 17:41:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 16737
Received: (qmail 2735 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2012 17:41:41 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <120119094118.ZM32561@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:41:18 -0800
In-reply-to:
 <CAHYJk3Tu8UsY5r3vnZ3P-R7hZOdheaBG2MLnQ+xLLeSUvF3Hbw@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In reply to Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
 "Re: Can we have an additional output option for setopt?" (Jan 18, 10:08pm)
References: <CB3C697C.3530%larrys@fb.com>
	<CAHYJk3Tu8UsY5r3vnZ3P-R7hZOdheaBG2MLnQ+xLLeSUvF3Hbw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: "zsh-users@zsh.org" <zsh-users@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: Can we have an additional output option for setopt?
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Jan 18, 10:08pm, Mikael Magnusson wrote:
}
} printf '%s\t%s\n' ${(kv)options

Even better:

printf '%-20s %s\n' ${(kv)options}

-- 
Barton E. Schaefer