From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-17015-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 22778 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2012 15:22:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 17015
Received: (qmail 29585 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2012 15:22:17 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <120416082155.ZM3144@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:21:55 -0700
In-reply-to: <20120416130811.GA3827@xvii.vinc17.org>
Comments: In reply to Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>
 "Re: [OT] Emacs and zsh syntax" (Apr 16,  3:08pm)
References:
 <CABZhJg-xFcnEqUoknF=WE_BV=n_JRL+fBC4DzeQAOerfiyB6Vg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANPayMRYWAV048wAUdM6oCsp2aOgxpow0Or6PW0xOE8xZY9Gmw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120416130811.GA3827@xvii.vinc17.org>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-users@zsh.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Emacs and zsh syntax
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Apr 16,  3:08pm, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
}
} I had reported the following bug in 2005:

Cynical jaundiced viewpoint:  Zsh is not a GNU project, and therefore it
isn't their priority to fix anything related to it.

Does zsh really even have a font-lock mode that is distinct from sh-mode?