From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5496 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2013 16:45:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 17978 Received: (qmail 29648 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2013 16:45:52 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at closedmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <130910094537.ZM10312@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:45:37 -0700 In-reply-to: <20130910173118.517c38fc@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: custom completion for listing *.tex is not working" (Sep 10, 5:31pm) References: <130903073216.ZM27351@torch.brasslantern.com> <130910080852.ZM9661@torch.brasslantern.com> <20130910173118.517c38fc@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: custom completion for listing *.tex is not working MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sep 10, 5:31pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Re: custom completion for listing *.tex is not working } } On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:08:52 -0700 } Bart Schaefer wrote: } > What the manual doesn't make clear is that file-patterns may have its } > values combined in sets the same way tag-order might. } } Isn't that what this bit is saying? Yes, it is. But that part is buried in the middle of a lot of text, and there are no examples of that usage (unlike tag-order whose first example is of that). I've forgotten whether group-order acts the same way (or where it would matter if it does).