From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15985 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2013 04:30:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 18021 Received: (qmail 16923 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2013 04:30:43 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 From: Bart Schaefer Message-id: <131004213045.ZM4296@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 21:30:45 -0700 In-reply-to: Comments: In reply to "Jack O'Connor" "Re: Emulating vim's Ctrl-W behavior" (Oct 4, 4:19pm) References: <20131004220328.GE19282@hazmatt> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-users Subject: Re: Emulating vim's Ctrl-W behavior MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Oct 4, 4:19pm, Jack O'Connor wrote: } } Awesome, and thanks for the quick response! I was using a mix of bindings } from the emacs and vi modes, and I'd ended up with the emacs version of } Ctrl-W without realizing they were different. If you want more control over the emacs backward-kill-word, have a look at the WORDCHARS variable. (To which you'd want to add "|", in the example you gave, and remove "/".)