From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-16158-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 27211 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2011 11:46:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 16158
Received: (qmail 1151 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2011 11:46:39 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
	T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=subject:from:reply-to:to:date:in-reply-to:references:content-type
         :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:mime-version;
        bh=d8kR1OsZ8Ncqk4mlJsWMwuKPNVc4RzkhNLrez2sTZiw=;
        b=GNOCTXsZmkv12B33xcwg2Cy7Gwh6edu691bDy4YiKkklJLy5T1At9WOhFji3KDiA9N
         4qnJycVKewlwVLp373Q5000knpKEfvawhSAwBN8gm2YrPuYxWpzwscTU7SFmpfjWbTpZ
         zlcAfWCbKutIcaBK+FzJWZz1ri1QoYTPxQMDE=
Subject: Re: how to refer to basename of $0
From: Tomasz Moskal <ramshackle.industries@gmail.com>
Reply-To: ramshackle.industries@gmail.com
To: zsh-users@zsh.org
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:48:03 +0100
In-Reply-To: <110728210438.ZM24370@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: 
	<CADjGqHuKhx9A3HCUBjU4JgRsbj52s7DQ6HGewT=Y9uRMDGD-fg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <alpine.LNX.2.01.1107282034110.18508@hp.internal>
	 <CADjGqHt4-PnBNC0QgyRVw0H-HtCWcRp_aA7N3zJoH+xK_676kw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <110728210438.ZM24370@torch.brasslantern.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1311940087.1494.27.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0

On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 21:04 -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Jul 28,  9:39pm, TJ Luoma wrote:
> }
> } Is it even possible to set NAME in .zsh* (and have it return
> } 'test.zsh' or are they called too early in the process?
> 
> This is sounding awfully familiar.  Oh, it was on zsh-workers, where
> some of the -users crowd would not have seen it.
> 
> Starts here:
> 
> http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2011/msg00159.html
> 
> Interesting branch begins here:
> 
> http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2011/msg00163.html
> 
> Particularly:
> 
> http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers//2011/msg00172.html

Thanks for the links, but I am still baffled -  basename $0  is working
here without any problems:

% cat ~/.zshenv
unsetopt function_argzero
name=`basename $0`

% cat ./foo
#!/bin/zsh
. ~/.zshenv
echo $name
exit 0

% ./foo
foo

Obviously it stops when I comment out  unsetopt function_argzero  but
with it in place it there is no problems with reporting the script name
-  zsh -i / -l / -f  make no difference.

Only options I have set in .zshrc are to do with history, basic
completion and prompt (what can I say? I am just getting acquainted with
zsh). Obviously the OPEN_PLAN_OFFICE_NO_VIGILANTE_ATTACKS option is gone
as well. Global zshenv has nothing but path and umask. So as you can see
there is no weirdness in any of the files alas  basename $0  do behave
in a different way than described here on on -workers.

What may be the reason of that?