From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 42 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2015 16:08:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 20338 Received: (qmail 16632 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2015 16:08:44 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: covici@ccs.covici.com To: Peter Stephenson cc: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: how to get zsh to work with a screen reader In-reply-to: <20150722114315.09444feb@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> References: <26940.1437503861@ccs.covici.com> <150721155605.ZM15346@torch.brasslantern.com> <5541.1437519744@ccs.covici.com> <20150722103446.GQ21160@localhost.mi.fu-berlin.de> <20150722114315.09444feb@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Stephenson message dated "Wed, 22 Jul 2015 11:43:15 +0100." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.5; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <14263.1437581318.1@ccs.covici.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:08:38 -0400 Message-ID: <14264.1437581318@ccs.covici.com> X-SpamH-OriginatingIP: 70.109.53.110 X-SpamH-Filter: d-out-001.smtp25.com-t6MG8ccp023939 Peter Stephenson wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:34:49 +0200 > "Christoph (Stucki) von Stuckrad" wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > = > > > > The ZLE editor does not use the curses package for screen optimiza= tion, > > = > > It might be a strange idea, but what happenes in different > > terminal-emulators? > = > Something else that might just be worth a look at is the shell parameter > BAUD, which indicates the terminal speed. It's not much used these > days, and isn't set by default, but you can set it to an estimate of the > terminal speed in bits per second. This changes the way the shell > decides to redisplay things. In particular, if it's small but > non-zero, the shell knows updates to the output take a long time --- > which is exactly your case, in effect. The code for this is still > there, though I don't think it's had much attention for some time. Thanks much for your response. I tried BAUD=3D110 and it slowed down the display of each character, but I still got the repeats, but maybe I can find something in the code around there to dink with -- thanks a lot. I also tried 300 and 1200, but I didn't notice any change. -- = Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com