From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-19733-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 5195 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2015 16:43:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 19733
Received: (qmail 14006 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2015 16:43:32 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-CMAE-Score: 0
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=PYxIXZlY c=1 sm=1 tr=0	a=FT8er97JFeGWzr5TCOCO5w==:117
 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=q2GGsy2AAAAA:8	a=oR5dmqMzAAAA:8 a=-9mUelKeXuEA:10
 a=YNv0rlydsVwA:10	a=-CrLoxdheaCXovEWEHcA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=cpcfWiXiaE8A:10
	a=tGOccTHg2z0A:10 a=YYFX4IVn2tcA:10
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <150112084308.ZM6520@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:43:08 -0800
In-reply-to: <20150112090903.GA27773@xvii.vinc17.org>
Comments: In reply to Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>
 "Re: completion" (Jan 12, 10:09am)
References: <141210214454.ZM12261@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<5489C8F4.8030703@eastlink.ca>	<141211092824.ZM13349@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<5489F1BC.5000900@eastlink.ca>	<20150107150109.GA14088@ypig.lip.ens-lyon.fr>
	<CAH+w=7YQ=VrWFjCXn4q7U48e3R+eNTF9xihHBf-oFDYTVR_zGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150108004323.GA7954@xvii.vinc17.org>
	<CAH+w=7ZPnjtZQJLM012ZJFx-zj7pFLzVivEG+Q=vixLGnjrM5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150108123606.GA9609@ypig.lip.ens-lyon.fr>
	<150109181241.ZM21734@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<20150112090903.GA27773@xvii.vinc17.org>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-users@zsh.org
Subject: Re: completion
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Jan 12, 10:09am, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
}
} Why hasn't this been done for the man page?

Because no one considered that one might be using the _foo completer
for a command whose name is "complete", because there is no such
command?

Documentation people make mistakes too ... and none of us is really
a documentation people.