From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13956 invoked by alias); 17 May 2015 04:16:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 20222 Received: (qmail 11700 invoked from network); 17 May 2015 04:16:47 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=X/Txm2l7uBra9jNOpOmifFvqX9BVzcAQwp+V4GCMi7M=; b=M9KZsq+fdeefeWlsM9k/ZvIAJjplnBxooWB7HTN8gt79wqHaMN8wxjyMB8mjy4P6hU 24KQH7WR1xEtIbbN70YyASOY5WlnmYuPvRkNAN+FsA7uYYHzJEtsCSlS346/ElXN6uX1 XVq+SZ9tRJ8R1mdb4qkY2GaOQsAg76l5QAKVa9W1pCLRLeTVXSfDTdbEWYymOvfLIP9e H4JKdvaZApcWNa5G1zLAVS3GX25FgJwsREwZX+23gSLYDN4Vn9vSo/0g+tyYjROKjdfx 2Y6CzmPsSQLj2OuV9jyOzWCsDwTjhOV3OhCy2oqhA6wPsbq+BtDLKKHwgSSqJ7/BflUP s+yg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmyYCv84I/yKDJUC13l53QweHhQh77AyZ1AoEah9JFcpHXtVsH07fK7dFkaFEG+Bs7oV4tS X-Received: by 10.202.108.132 with SMTP id h126mr13875496oic.5.1431836205736; Sat, 16 May 2015 21:16:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <150516211642.ZM4541@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 21:16:42 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20150516225320.GG1976@tarsus.local2> Comments: In reply to Daniel Shahaf "Re: Add matchspec for foo/bar branch names in git completion" (May 16, 10:53pm) References: <20150514143747.GF1932@tarsus.local2> <150514103503.ZM30786@torch.brasslantern.com> <20150516225320.GG1976@tarsus.local2> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: Add matchspec for foo/bar branch names in git completion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On May 16, 10:53pm, Daniel Shahaf wrote: } } Other ideas? I just looked again at your original patch, and I *think* you'll get what you want if you simply change all 'r:|=*' to be 'r:|=**'.