From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4998 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2015 16:15:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 20339 Received: (qmail 13960 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2015 16:15:34 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=1zPhzHaRInQUwLNLZHnYf16LjqpcDvvio7izRYHqWlI=; b=H+AqK+V6Mw3Cp09Gs8E4OigI9X72jjoIF7UXkGVR/UA1zEZhcCQDQAYyVF2Ur0h1bb WKlHkoRSLw0NqEiF4m87Apf+X7Qnc6ccumvgYq5wHx+l+eM2CHNgfgpK32O3DlZBf3SZ Rt2SU0cwZkKBmRIo+aI2VJUSlCV+OpveaQe+o9aQyGCFH5lauLZyOgFThGm7AgV0PrkH gH1UzRCFH3McD+HDPYQjT+jYGDWd2rRizVUlpMiV6Dcf7IKyOCET4qZDDkC4yykl75pp m6FNqc5zImsz8ZQSfVpy9+pLUWuwywP/vNbFfzxddUFW8FDSrHjnRc7hazBlhWs3uKoh 68+w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn6i2gxv78MVE1laOEgb30xxBm2MONuYSXChf1dObLlPj68SVOjZExw0jw/4tzZobr2p+xg X-Received: by 10.202.53.136 with SMTP id c130mr3388489oia.2.1437581731355; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:15:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <150722091528.ZM16598@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:15:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20150722114315.09444feb@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: how to get zsh to work with a screen reader" (Jul 22, 11:43am) References: <26940.1437503861@ccs.covici.com> <150721155605.ZM15346@torch.brasslantern.com> <5541.1437519744@ccs.covici.com> <20150722103446.GQ21160@localhost.mi.fu-berlin.de> <20150722114315.09444feb@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: how to get zsh to work with a screen reader MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jul 22, 11:43am, Peter Stephenson wrote: } } Something else that might just be worth a look at is the shell parameter } BAUD, which indicates the terminal speed. I tried this. I captured the output with "script" and examined what was written both before and after assigning BAUD=1 . As an aside, the main effect of BAUD seems to be that ZLE waits a really long time after executing a command and before printing the next prompt. I connected with strace and found it sitting here: select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {112, 800000}) = 0 (Timeout) That is, the prompt wasn't printed until the timeout occurred. I suspect that it's checking for type-ahead. Anyway, except for my backspacing over a couple of typos, the typescript was identical in both cases. Based on covici's follow-up, the terminfo definition seems to make the only discernable difference.