From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16860 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2010 19:45:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 15628 Received: (qmail 3312 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2010 19:45:28 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at yahoo.co.uk does not designate permitted sender hosts) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1291664362; bh=I+VlUpQkAy15APJWddMz6pbUo+DZybPeEwGwdhvwBeY=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:cc:In-reply-to:From:References:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID; b=T6AFiYTJeJ2cnnfFEWZqke5QMr/OZ4KEgzMoHG24bBJNpWG4koBh/i1WHw3FZi/yFtdSScTLPT6QD1fg1R06QO5vTMR8gnalcUxVG3YHH1lATy1AXIqaTkc9/pfgVtezVQzT2qHl9AjZBNTFmHiu0hoZ9Noc/5KX2B37nVeL1Ls= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 369197.84867.bm@smtp123.mail.ukl.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-SMTP: opAkk_CswBAce_kJ3nIPlH80cJI- X-YMail-OSG: .m06N.oVM1kLTsVkh7XBlW9_0pmlGVClrmtpaziJbKOPSFb hGKj7KwF8nsqoUSwRygOSs2qydA1OJmWGget.Gs8U9mJ9RIRH92AV4gGlXLo k_mhOWbJJnl50dgwzGcutn43qcXwu5spomhehnTP3f7RTm6b5v1R_W0l3s91 sJVrSxtW.mHyqFWfKa.W8c9lVyOn4suGcYtotltiDKssRG_HqyhmihKKzOyp z6D4xYkaldUw.NICNYrMDtgcsBk0fwhMTyzfMGgr0sx_qRowyKEHqWQ.u5yw HDDvh X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 cc: Zsh Users In-reply-to: From: Oliver Kiddle References: <201012061512.21791.mrichter@theory.phy.tu-dresden.de> <20101206151124.389fd287@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> To: Mikael Magnusson Subject: Re: Using the same completion function for various commands Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:39:21 +0100 Message-ID: <15197.1291664361@thecus> Mikael Magnusson wrote: > Ah, er, right. But. Is there any way to combine -p and saying foo=du ? > When I tried compdef _du -p 'foo_*=du' nothing happened. zstyle ':completion:*:foo_*::variant' command du --version Peter wrote: > Why we would ever prefer $words[1] to $service, when this seems > to be what $service is for? Aside from the case Bart mentioned, there's also cases like: compdef gdu=du Oliver