From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2234 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2016 17:20:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 21244 Received: (qmail 7102 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2016 17:20:40 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject :mime-version:content-type; bh=yuGgr88yCJvD8MMRhd3VBUD7cNKpgZSCR3jfQNZwe80=; b=NgvPcSKax17XrKLMBK8HrRB9gsAO5dsjzaHkgg9ZAtpRiUIzyOl7Q84dfk/XL6mx5c hI+gnJcbofIhdSB8ehSWbvE2ZbkGagGG/rQ+PWKwm25eYjF6HCk6RHHeAO7W6QzT30e7 PKuakUySAsPqaKXTsZ3/EqhS30L6p4rIpX7Zbzw2kF80zl2sxqQrukDF4CSvAWf7jgUS 4x84OwBaSISaPnt3LD/bgszsT5sCT1tlOQY9uV9rngfL8i6FU2zLPYMYVlwr7U/Iowz2 xT7Oo6xKaVY15YqMl+zo38eh73MtMgdFbc6THsRtifVbRUuBZVnM7hzVZcNiqncURMPN sKPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=yuGgr88yCJvD8MMRhd3VBUD7cNKpgZSCR3jfQNZwe80=; b=BTqyuy3YqmKsUqOhAPapKH4/GAO46PaF7xQobCXe7j26SisjUp7J9YXKdl6hWLd+z1 VtF9NZQs7oXsUSWCOBvbCPuI3cqACFo8wvOY1lsBQh8pPE7K+ZijZeG5VAPWzm8Oygqf IE37hKzKfBcQoHFm04x0aAPL8RnOkzCy2nICnki8EDNv7DJRvVhOo/dEu48i8NBZyi75 lpXfCRawwFmLYoogWa5g4vAigVooTPPd4QfXHbk5MYflGY5NJXideRsXkKDOdsCQ9E47 nm043d76JGWZjCYcfAnnpzR0SSG8GkYJEbcnM9XVIsAeGfFA5l5++/sZGQz6riXwsLUh Xu9A== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQ1Pu29FW0coO3UTCG9ai3fmtmd9HpPhVZ+yNZQOs5JQiRRwNzRTtxeoIPd5XBjnw== X-Received: by 10.66.255.6 with SMTP id am6mr5616408pad.106.1454692837865; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 09:20:37 -0800 (PST) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <160205092038.ZM29758@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:20:38 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20160205164606.7ff9d27d@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: PATCH: funcstack[-1] (formerly Suppress tracing of "set +x")" (Feb 5, 4:46pm) References: <20151230104531.GA20496@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5683F898.7010907@inlv.org> <20160205100902.GA14979@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160205102735.1f09973a@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20160205104444.2437ad33@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20160205160236.1274aa5b@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <160205081428.ZM29587@torch.brasslantern.com> <20160205164606.7ff9d27d@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: PATCH: funcstack[-1] (formerly Suppress tracing of "set +x") MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Feb 5, 4:46pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Re: PATCH: funcstack[-1] (formerly Suppress tracing of "set +x") } } On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:14:28 -0800 } Bart Schaefer wrote: } > On Feb 5, 4:02pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } > } } > } My main worry is someone is using ${#funcstack} to decide if they're at } > } top-level, rather than zsh_eval_context, which would now fail. } > } > There are several uses of $#funcstack in the Completion/ function suite. } } None of them are sensitive to (permanently) adding an extra level at the } end of the array, as far as I can see. My concern is that $_tags_level is initialized to 0 in _main_complete and then compared to $#funcstack later. If $#funcstack is now always no less than 1, that will be wrong. Of course we can fix _main_complete to initialize to 1, but this does imply that comparisons to $#funcstack are not an unknown programming technique.