From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14638 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2016 02:08:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 22235 Received: (qmail 28063 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2016 02:08:27 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-vk0-f50.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(209.85.213.50):SA:0(-0.0/5.0):. Processed in 4.363841 secs); 19 Dec 2016 02:08:27 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.213.50 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject :mime-version; bh=/6J7uWVryosJBluMSu6G4eaK4TKtBsO6m8khYD3f2E0=; b=kxQstZ2lz2UEaAxeWy76i/6zucx70OYTpw6/Ql10eUA6vjJbPqM2mk5AkhZEWgaoeB FZnwrc+q5Mup2FKbqAbRvaz00+jJ3b774WcRa/fEl7OWVOvZIoHyRn41XCZeJZ/2gFSO zRXITDvZ3u4yG8UZMQVEa8n+wLcb6hLDqkp2Nrt5wyqnWn8AkeTNylcXAFdyDCP8AAlu sQaECy/gJmzyH3TMpS5KeSFtdDmD5KUKiky3o/LpfPx5d6SeGPzS/Hxoml/CwDr7E1zJ MxkbZbXOKxBSwevPM9RZTCtB4IUd+i1eNj2cgPyAj29kkKI/BfaPqk+klvP48/MDkiss ugbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version; bh=/6J7uWVryosJBluMSu6G4eaK4TKtBsO6m8khYD3f2E0=; b=Um/+mPd8D0WbSRGY1NSH9YHnjVANQJSUkvgY2EuHOaOkF+rHGDI7dOSmJPD1rnXA3r iIaqifw+ludOJhXQnNKfwA/0qWwSIkqe3F9VxS4ridKSvmPgvgBFwL1EuIuyzWwjZ1J0 cgsAXpGm+wbt8HnK3vbrVlR65PxhI6wPsqgsmbUJaC6goEuT+5k4k6oIU1ocu0//PvDL oJmyWhosBCGVhS/eswyzvHq6FFS2NGmbB381bWjglouRL5YMgo9A3HTggnkRokylXa3C LXZbyWbYJIB4tPjD5XMjxhiAB3NlacCeKs/Ue1cPe1N6SdsZlk8s23XEn9Bv2ZNYRyzo qPfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIEm35pI3z92R9o1ZFSle+d3sYj3VYvFff8M3A3mTE49NcJrctd6cg6EteZqEoRtA== X-Received: by 10.31.185.144 with SMTP id j138mr4534834vkf.102.1482113288445; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:08:08 -0800 (PST) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <161218180807.ZM5238@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:08:07 -0800 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to Pablo Lalloni "Apparent inconsistency in f/z expansion flags behavior" (Dec 18, 8:02pm) References: X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: Apparent inconsistency in f/z expansion flags behavior MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Dec 18, 8:02pm, Pablo Lalloni wrote: } } words=(${(z)$(