From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3802 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2017 04:12:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 22602 Received: (qmail 3092 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2017 04:12:47 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-ua0-f181.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(209.85.217.181):SA:0(-0.0/5.0):. Processed in 1.188215 secs); 23 Mar 2017 04:12:47 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.217.181 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject :mime-version; bh=jkPLDS44QKkwsoJqh0pCmeq3N55PGmVzlwikBBASFZA=; b=jON7647hjvxORzdYcrB6Dowl2zNzOi6VmdoYr79Zl95VrwVG+OU7Afmi5mUQr6YL+U SSvU/KBgT6cGoA9b+odFpaJ7AbZ8O6rhLBe04n5O2TPIvNtv4QvlI8EJBgfNLx6jflVH cCqFw7gLFXbdv0GO+1Aijwn6pvVMiYo/x3hrGnPo2kOXH/u6g0e93GRWmzd4FfhsfOKF xJQfBepXMnDjshmdhUzV6ToYGz6FbnVpCQ8qA42dkvzzoYrXHLAWuJ+6wGKGUas67Zkq bFDWqnVy76h5IBIsTctNtkOLmJ8W+VeDTz9KHH9T4I4EbAveMqGaerKReQsdXvibuVL4 qKWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version; bh=jkPLDS44QKkwsoJqh0pCmeq3N55PGmVzlwikBBASFZA=; b=MzNPBPm8OOERFySlC06eNOIa1N45H3LvjF3PFrw+1Z2Fruzr78MJgBrQ5AePwErbYc IIfcxY3jdDXa/8z3ShUOOb5SsgPDjlbTDzScIby+5/IHsSNomAWj7/aGyVyUqquqRi+w fSC7wrCSXF4gzka/A37vqBUfctXP6ujereEMcauMWUqo5OAFZtySwyizR7UiNpPqNJnU 2J2RhuE1TvXpO1JueK8oDs+WQsgMZDnDC0K1txy6pCTRKPZZFRjG5dOMYKnsW4TOuk2+ agYBJmqeRDDWfdfDK6BCUeTFwZ+hxJ/SiA3FLg2zzYIa7ggc+bPBMNc7VO/XpmPClCxI Ts1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0ozHy5NheiR5f2DlKk9cbrIoufxt9Sz+s0yKs6Ccz2rsFDMIBvJgXwFOU3pVq+xQ== X-Received: by 10.176.6.74 with SMTP id f68mr230517uaf.118.1490242360572; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:12:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <170322211337.ZM6292@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:13:37 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170322033504.nodq5vk34ehtwa44@fishbowl.rw.madduck.net> Comments: In reply to martin f krafft "Re: Making file-patterns and tag-order work" (Mar 22, 4:35pm) References: <20170321094917.3aopmzwkpaam7kgl@fishbowl.rw.madduck.net> <170321181534.ZM1895@torch.brasslantern.com> <20170322033504.nodq5vk34ehtwa44@fishbowl.rw.madduck.net> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: martin f krafft , zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: Making file-patterns and tag-order work MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mar 22, 4:35pm, martin f krafft wrote: } } also sprach Bart Schaefer [2017-03-22 14:15 +1300]: } > } zstyle ':completion:*:argument*' tag-order " } > } directories } > } globbed-files files all-files } > } backup-files } > } compiled-files } > } temp-files } > } vim-swap-files } > } " } > } > This is wrong. If you combine tags into a single string, they } > will all be sorted together. tag-order is a list -- try without } > the double quotes around the value (which means you'll need } > backslashes at the end of each line, or similar). } } I also tried that. It makes absolutely no difference, actually. Oops, my bad. You want group-order here, not tag-order. group-order This style is additional to the group-name style to specify the order for display of the groups defined by that style (compare tag-order, which determines which completions appear at all). I'm surprised no one else jumped in on this. The fact that they're both named "-order" is a bit confusing; for tag-order, it means the order in which the completions are attempted, and for group-order it means the order in which the results are displayed.