From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-22693-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 3253 invoked by alias); 12 May 2017 22:02:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 22693
Received: (qmail 25562 invoked from network); 12 May 2017 22:02:54 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-ua0-f172.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <schaefer@brasslantern.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.217.172):SA:0(-2.8/5.0):. 
 Processed in 1.515865 secs); 12 May 2017 22:02:54 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.217.172 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject
         :mime-version;
        bh=593diPUlqvD9dskqcMXmJaXt/tD8lO4iThj/cO4GY8Q=;
        b=HuWLPozAhC/w9RoOifC3M6/yEPAqvBvAMbzq/eEAQINCath3ZlEgBYNRMVkELZPm/m
         l2Ew0KO2iSSsupPGxpc7M2qyMVO1JwDRSnN6MwWmU9f0dvRj/aCBrNLGYBOEGis/FuAD
         /jUP0SWniRo9y1diS/x6j9VltsxKpkA5H5y9dOLqtP5mo678vYzban6LjTm8CkoLB8+l
         GBLFuVqktx4CTil/geW+wX0U/9+YgPou1/+kevc4nahnTzq59Yk5SgluFKVtfzdDLnZn
         bpxnXfGmlDrl555j+44u1Nw4firivVzGNotz6S5JqNK/ly7Wb88t5FOhnQ3y/gXrXapy
         PIwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments
         :references:to:subject:mime-version;
        bh=593diPUlqvD9dskqcMXmJaXt/tD8lO4iThj/cO4GY8Q=;
        b=EvwAp1U8kN3P63Bl5k4kJEInNntSr8XWtnsoS7Hva1Qw6juBzQ4LNngD7zJJX7T2+0
         paPzH2h8jtOEuzwJ1pI+o77B06HUb/pFSZDlWfFtxKINKLoDypat9utRrgF9PbNrA5NX
         7vCHmPF2JABydba0uuA4mKx1AIa+Mvmy2xZCFFOU0bb0TzCgInaR2teTzeKqaWk0BjkI
         JwFgpsxw4BNqLmYdVLUZ36zZyJ36ueVSjjQ2zK0ARyrKs1sZFzoXfJ0gomKN8RcmgWfE
         QZdnZ3TzkS7LFswmRDnOJYd4K2A/5cHkyBetO++1DuUtxs8T5SBQgjPZDYThIUmwfpNw
         uh4g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBTZzpAsUSDjeoOIVh1ATl5OUIRMRHfh3uHh+nO2NCWwF7l8F30
	YzAzIoJh5zIuBHlE
X-Received: by 10.176.69.206 with SMTP id u72mr3339242uau.69.1494626564240;
        Fri, 12 May 2017 15:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <170512150302.ZM9904@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 15:03:02 -0700
In-Reply-To: <etPan.5915e115.238e1f29.6b4c@MacMini.local>
Comments: In reply to Sebastian Gniazdowski <psprint@zdharma.org>
        "declare -p and -H (hideval)" (May 12,  6:21pm)
References: <etPan.5915e115.238e1f29.6b4c@MacMini.local>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: zsh-users@zsh.org
Subject: Re: declare -p and -H (hideval)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On May 12,  6:21pm, Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote:
}
} I use "declare -p" there, when user selects a parameter. No value is
} being shown for -H parameters. Is this correct?

Yes.  Manual for -p option says:

      If the -p option is given, parameters and values are printed
      in the form of a typeset command with an assignment,
      regardless of other flags and options.  Note that the -H flag
      on parameters is respected; no value will be shown for these
      parameters.

This takes precedence over the -m flag, etc.

} Any way to avoid -H effects with typeset -p?

It would appear not.