From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22897 invoked by alias); 14 May 2017 17:21:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 22697 Received: (qmail 26287 invoked from network); 14 May 2017 17:21:54 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-vk0-f50.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(209.85.213.50):SA:0(0.5/5.0):. Processed in 1.469917 secs); 14 May 2017 17:21:54 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.213.50 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject :mime-version; bh=y5qGk5fePBe1/fdf/uHC+vE4dua0t278AL14X/P36JU=; b=ossc58JWGidS8ndqJUr8T8PjlI1sK6cqnM9xyUSFOBnj5g7OAV6X3+V9i+jmjpmhZx D1uwBWtYCCBCCs0ZZZrG3X0KWZQ52Spi94Ja+WW200gMsAEtWtckZgCKRIzs5k3gspiK tvTnAQnBBGQwEuN0pjy3MjsRpeklyJa0AT3sHvi5jJMM88Q6eeuLYlz+X6QJJMsSOteY zdy/CA+DLzEGPF6R8UFy+QnjInrZFf9AtURNHf3uQdsnUcda4en93WAfxcmRkw8wHPgs iJFz1odKdKGQbiRFkfYqkawCPvFdK7Awe9OKbUar5UYMlgJeO0MtgV9ZSqHzbT5rW6JG Je3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments :references:to:subject:mime-version; bh=y5qGk5fePBe1/fdf/uHC+vE4dua0t278AL14X/P36JU=; b=DFq2PjuZJ0kdHywmhfNwbCDCOQXgEMVeIIc7RxquAmQoiJzSechM7lfLi2cqGXaxHI v2/KuDLz6n5Fc29hwTxQyX5piEAMz+eyJKyNGoRMHBC+f4vSkDN4rTkGjzCfyiLBZzcL ubJHfgFeGgbi08UoPRG7FVUA+cu1L8W30sF/EKYlqt1yVLuIaV6e8zoJ3kDFbHvm2EB0 vLzIdX0MsGIj/hY+JWq/KKRgY1tb/TUeiCVtHroNIYgYhIIUiK4lpU0zwDCznACU8KaY zPQke55+CuF3lg++WmfovZ8kKQ4YORi4c4xzDa7tW8YaSEp+S2GpfrXTwpQaJqsLiVSL POPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCrdsdMghWIJd8VMbvI4tWPqnG7Nc39uTvMi4ZgGFIWFt+5fvab biVJ4hG1NSlaLV2e X-Received: by 10.31.61.7 with SMTP id k7mr962433vka.82.1494782505426; Sun, 14 May 2017 10:21:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Message-Id: <170514102207.ZM15414@torch.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 10:22:07 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170514010444.GA4046@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> Comments: In reply to Daniel Shahaf "Re: declare -p and -H (hideval)" (May 14, 1:04am) References: <170512150302.ZM9904@torch.brasslantern.com> <20170514010444.GA4046@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005) To: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: declare -p and -H (hideval) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On May 14, 1:04am, Daniel Shahaf wrote: } } The fact remains that the "does not apply" clause that Sebastian quoted } does not match the implementation. The question is just which of them } should be fixed to match the other. (Code archeology may answer this, } but I'm not going to do it tonight.) Based on git history, -p has always taken precendence here. It'd be quite simple to make -pm behave differently with respect to the value. However, I also note that PM_HIDEVAL is not one of the "type flags" that is output by "typeset -p" -- it only emits flags for things like array, integer, padding/alignment, etc. So that would presumably also need to change, which begins to get more involved.