From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-22733-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 16314 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2017 16:38:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 22733
Received: (qmail 8071 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2017 16:38:42 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-vk0-f50.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <schaefer@brasslantern.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(209.85.213.50):SA:0(-0.0/5.0):. 
 Processed in 1.153294 secs); 17 Jun 2017 16:38:42 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.213.50 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject
         :mime-version;
        bh=tpuezWmZNoN+d8vlDlEssVHfZkWPaedK42YFAvDHctQ=;
        b=A7lWpGiTkoxcajIi6BZdB4VWPDbB2G3K0UsDDbCucR0AkmqJcCjgk030ch6YtL6WTs
         w0UEbsyigc3KUrOW5S6766lEx4mpyUoWs1cDYbuCiKxvC7Vzt2f6dllQHO8wy64XCCFk
         o5MF14SHNBpqjgoPgp2lskphxFfq1m97cgeuiC8r3uO9ZSCrlE8OskymW7HTBJHi6a1e
         tR00w+Vp7KGY1LAA6tXDW75Ci7hayrUdyOPQDPWUwNUcY12yT6xJktcwyAuK1ruYMv6L
         HtCihuPg76FEzEyMBcCRhGmhmXC3MxiOazid/O8FxrfWhXzPAAxU1DEnMPjo9YCNgldp
         Hiuw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments
         :references:to:subject:mime-version;
        bh=tpuezWmZNoN+d8vlDlEssVHfZkWPaedK42YFAvDHctQ=;
        b=W4F9Yv/rQ8aNr5mzp1n1vSjAwMmkOdq/Zz5lmCc0dsQ81DI7lgBmUrk87b05o0KV4n
         OhenGiWOLV1WllSM7GllziYUwcdJoFjTzC1L2wf27QKKXHdn8BjgVSIOtxdtxce9ShJP
         j6i3RIlTDyqnCgc5iblBhmZn6W94/MP7meGccKnnj7WD/8Lgievm3YwsCWba8B/Gh1CA
         brE7tOr4Bft6Nm0Tt2T8dP7HD8mWytJMVjPfwyS4G8vZprcsqv3Juq7/BwF06FsTGywP
         tJ7O7jN1utgASmYHaXWQnBVoA9BqvUBwjQx4uXcA3s9bK/CcBDWHL3rqmUVhudMLDUC+
         U6FQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyajgm6l8Wm4DzATh882P6fX2mPaL3bA5Dm9n9RGBMSwQDEHWp8
	Mcpo+EnWqNGmvmSO7UE=
X-Received: by 10.31.195.196 with SMTP id t187mr9059838vkf.151.1497717513386;
        Sat, 17 Jun 2017 09:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-Id: <170617093919.ZM990@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 09:39:19 -0700
In-Reply-To: <etPan.59454e4c.589b5290.170d2@zdharma.org>
Comments: In reply to Sebastian Gniazdowski <psprint@zdharma.org>
        "Re: Why sourcing a file is not faster than doing a loop with eval, zle -N" (Jun 17,  5:44pm)
References: <etPan.594513a8.516100cd.10b2e@zdharma.org> 
	<CAH+w=7bVXtubcdwvEBC9isE32683dUipAUS=vrAkgO5pp2bkkw@mail.gmail.com> 
	<CAH+w=7afTi=1bfLBCmq8-vB-rLWDtEkAtk8gCCna3-mQwZ1-Ow@mail.gmail.com> 
	<etPan.594538f9.2ea629d6.10b2e@AirmailxGenerated.am> 
	<etPan.5945430b.7b33db1b.10b2e@zdharma.org> 
	<etPan.59454e4c.589b5290.170d2@zdharma.org>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: Zsh Users <zsh-users@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: Why sourcing a file is not faster than doing a loop with eval, zle -N
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Jun 17,  5:44pm, Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote:
}
} So the gain from zcompiled .fsh_cache seems to be maximal.

As long as you've got a good way to test these timings ... compile
your .fsh_cache file with "zcompile -R" and see if you still get
any speedup?

Some simple tests that I did seem to indicate that zcompile does
not do much good if the default "zcompile -M" behavior is disabled.