From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23177 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2004 10:58:55 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 10:58:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 1013 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2004 10:58:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 7097 Received: (qmail 949 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2004 10:58:33 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 10:58:33 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [62.189.58.19] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 10:58:33 -0000 Received: from MAILSWEEPER01.csr.com (mailhost1.csr.com [62.189.183.235]) by lhuumrelay3.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i22AwXv25737 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:58:33 GMT Received: from EXCHANGE02.csr.com (unverified [192.168.137.45]) by MAILSWEEPER01.csr.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:58:14 +0000 Received: from csr.com ([192.168.144.127]) by EXCHANGE02.csr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Tue, 2 Mar 2004 11:00:07 +0000 To: zsh-users@sunsite.dk (Zsh users list) Subject: Re: Two Questions In-reply-to: "Nikolai Weibull"'s message of "Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:47:04 +0100." <20040302104703.GC1981@puritan.pcp.ath.cx> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 10:58:32 +0000 Message-ID: <17342.1078225112@csr.com> From: Peter Stephenson X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2004 11:00:07.0922 (UTC) FILETIME=[864E0520:01C40045] Nikolai Weibull wrote: > Question 1 > ---------- > > How do I post to zsh-users as I am only subscribed to this list and thus > need to confirm my emails to zsh-users? Is the only way to work with it > to confirm? Since the lists are nested, subscribing to both is not very > good. You only need to confirm once. It just happens to be separately for each list. > Question 2 > ---------- > > This should have gone to zsh-users but still. Is there any way to > disable equals completion (the -equals- context)? Since I have noequals > set it's rather silly to have the completion system trying to expand it. > I tried figuring out a way to check for '-o equals' somewhere but didn't > come up with anything decent. compdef -d -- -equal- If you have magicequalsubst set it will still try to perform default completion after an `='. -- Peter Stephenson Software Engineer CSR Ltd., Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WH, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070 ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com **********************************************************************