From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29131 invoked from network); 29 Jan 1997 16:20:34 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by coral.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 Jan 1997 16:20:34 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA23822; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 10:59:28 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 10:45:59 -0500 (EST) To: Zefram From: Roderick Schertler Cc: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: foo=($bar) vs foo=("$bar[@]") In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 29 Jan 1997 15:17:35 EST." References: <4664.199701291517@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 10:45:55 -0500 Message-Id: <1816.854552755@eeyore.ibcinc.com> Sender: roderick@ibcinc.com Resent-Message-ID: <"ipdlD1.0.wh5.r2txo"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/634 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Wed, 29 Jan 1997 15:17:35 +0000 (GMT), Zefram said: > > "$bar[@]" works in all cases, but $bar will drop empty array elements: Ouch, I didn't know that! I guess that shows how much zsh programming I actually do. -- Roderick Schertler roderick@gate.net