From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gatech.edu (gatech.edu [130.207.244.244]) by werple.mira.net.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA08683 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 1995 12:20:47 +1000 Received: from math (math.skiles.gatech.edu) by gatech.edu with SMTP id AA06813 (5.65c/Gatech-10.0-IDA for ); Mon, 14 Aug 1995 22:21:13 -0400 Received: by math (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA26410; Mon, 14 Aug 1995 12:38:31 -0400 Old-Return-Path: Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 12:34:56 -0400 Old-Return-Path: Message-Id: <199508141634.MAA09619@tanelorn> To: Carlos Carvalho Cc: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: how does zsh compare with other shells bugwise? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 14 Aug 1995 11:46:04 -0300." <199508141446.LAA01225@snfep1.if.usp.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 12:34:56 -0400 From: Nicholas Vargish Resent-Message-Id: <"g2Ylt3.0.lR6.KhtBm"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/54 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu > Can you out there make a comparison or give an opinion? Zsh has been the default "new user shell" here for the past year and a half, mostly my doing (I'm on a "stamp out tcsh" crusade). I'd say we have about thirty users running zsh... Most of the actual bugs haven't affected them, since they don't do a lot of "fancy" stuff with their shells. Nick +------------------------------------+ "This house is dark." | Nick Vargish, BBN Planet (SURAnet) | "Madman, thou errest: I say, there | vargish@sura.net 301/489-8134 | is no darkness but ignorance." | http://www.sura.net/~vargish | [Shakespeare, Twelfth Night]