From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3/2) with ESMTP id CAA24630 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 1996 02:17:50 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA05407; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 12:06:25 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 1996 12:04:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: 12 Jun 1996 15:52:25 -0000 Message-ID: <19960612155225.6557.qmail@squirrel.owl.de> From: jkroeger@squirrel.owl.de (Johannes Kroeger) To: hzoli@cs.elte.hu CC: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu In-reply-to: <199606101703.TAA05789@bolyai.cs.elte.hu> (message from Zoltan Hidvegi on Mon, 10 Jun 1996 19:03:16 +0200 (MET DST)) Subject: Re: zsh-2.6beta20 doesn't compile under Linux pre2.0.14 Resent-Message-ID: <"gS-Pb3.0.AJ1.ofkln"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/252 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Hello Zoltan, Thank you for your quick patch. As Steven L Baur noticed in , RLIMIT_AS is only defined in but not yet used in the kernel. >[...]. Also a new flag should be invented to set this limit with ulimit. >Please tell me your suggestions. RLIMIT_AS is only defined for the Intel, Alpha and Mips architectures. and have no RLIMIT_VMEM, and has the following definition: #define RLIMIT_VMEM 6 /* mapped memory */ #define RLIMIT_AS RLIMIT_VMEM So it seems that 'ulimit -v' and 'limit vmemorysize' are the right commands to control the new resource limit. Anyway, I would recommend you to ask the gurus in the linux-kernel list about the intended implementation of the "address space limit". Cheers, Johannes -- Johannes Kroeger Send me mail with subject "send pgp-key" to get my PGP key