From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA06430 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 1996 22:00:48 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA17302; Mon, 5 Aug 1996 07:53:16 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Mon, 5 Aug 1996 07:50:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199608051148.HAA01867@nerc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <960804235458.ZM10347@candle.brasslantern.com> X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 3.3 (Enhance 1.3) From: "Timothy J. Luoma" Date: Mon, 5 Aug 96 07:48:31 -0400 To: schaefer@nbn.com Subject: Re: zsh 3.0 pre6 VERY slow on nextstep 3.2 cc: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Reply-To: luomat@nerc.com References: <199608050112.VAA22841@nerc.com> <960804235458.ZM10347@candle.brasslantern.com> Organization: Princeton Theological Seminary Resent-Message-ID: <"IhiCv1.0.TD4.g_T1o"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/342 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu "Bart Schaefer" on Sun, 4 Aug 1996 wrote: > Did you compile with debugging and zsh_mem and so forth?=20 No, just regular ./configure > To what previous version are you comparing it (so we know what > changes to re-examine)? 2.6-beta13 is what I've been using, but I've got 3.0-pre2 here too = and that did not display this beahvior. Would you need/like to see the compiling output? Thanks for the help, I love zsh but it really is too slow to be = usable... TjL