From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA00582 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 01:58:34 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA03411; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 11:51:21 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Aug 1996 11:45:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199608061544.LAA18029@tertius.res.cmu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2) In-Reply-To: <199608051148.HAA01867@nerc.com> X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 3.3 (Enhance 1.3) From: Charles Swiger Date: Tue, 6 Aug 96 11:44:19 -0400 To: luomat@nerc.com Subject: Re: zsh 3.0 pre6 VERY slow on nextstep 3.2 cc: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Reply-To: References: <199608050112.VAA22841@nerc.com> <960804235458.ZM10347@candle.brasslantern.com> <199608051148.HAA01867@nerc.com> X-URL: http://www.its.com/ Resent-Message-ID: <"NUWVd.0.Lp.ZYs1o"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/344 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Mon, 5 Aug 96, "Timothy J. Luoma" wrote: > Would you need/like to see the compiling output? > > Thanks for the help, I love zsh but it really is too slow to be usable... I tried building under NEXTSTEP 3.3. './configure' generates two core dumps; apparently the linker chokes trying to link POSIX stuff without '-posix', since building the test program which does tgetent((char*)0,"vt100") coredumps using either NeXT's cc or a gcc-2.7.2 I built. Pressing on, I built zsh, but I didn't notice any obvious slowdowns. -Chuck "yet-another-data-point" Swiger Charles Swiger | chuck@tertius.res.cmu.edu | standard disclaimer ---------------+---------------------------+-------------------- I know you're an optimist if you think I'm a pessimist.