From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA01600 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 1996 15:30:33 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA13194; Thu, 22 Aug 1996 01:29:51 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 01:21:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199608220519.BAA16730@nerc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <199608190336.NAA02977@coral.primenet.com.au> X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 3.3 (Enhance 1.3) From: "Timothy J. Luoma" Date: Thu, 22 Aug 96 01:19:37 -0400 To: Geoff Wing Subject: Re: zsh 3.0 still intolerably slow on NeXTStep 3.2 cc: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu, schaefer@nbn.com Reply-To: luomat@nerc.com References: <199608190336.NAA02977@coral.primenet.com.au> Organization: Princeton Theological Seminary Resent-Message-ID: <"JX6L61.0.7D3.bv-6o"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/373 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu I changed the 'refresh' line, but nothing changed. The slowness is apparent when: 1) prompts are being drawn 2) when I use the up-arrow to go back through history commands... = (and the down arrow as well)