From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA12946 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 17:36:08 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA28148; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 03:29:11 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 03:27:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199609270726.JAA08593@hydra.ifh.de> X-Authentication-Warning: hydra.ifh.de: Host pws@localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: twiddle-number problem? In-reply-to: ""Bart Schaefer""'s message of "Thu, 26 Sep 1996 10:42:53 MET." <960926104254.ZM15298@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 09:26:42 +0200 From: Peter Stephenson Resent-Message-ID: <"UUUE83.0.Dt6.87uIo"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/427 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu "Bart Schaefer" wrote: > I can't find anything that the following patch breaks (except a directory > stack 1000+ levels deep). Can anyone else? Actually, anyone with 1000 levels is presumably not going to be fazed by having to type ~+1000, so I don't even think that's an objection. > *** Src/subst.c.0 Mon Sep 23 22:04:54 1996 > --- Src/subst.c Thu Sep 26 10:13:40 1996 > ... > ! } else if (idigit(str[1]) && /* ~42 */ > ! (isend(str[2]) || > ! (idigit(str[2]) && > ! (isend(str[3]) || > ! (idigit(str[3]) && > ! isend(str[4]))))) { > ... Oops, there's a close parenthesis missing in that list line. -- Peter Stephenson Tel: +49 33762 77366 WWW: http://www.ifh.de/~pws/ Fax: +49 33762 77330 Deutches Electronen-Synchrotron --- Institut fuer Hochenergiephysik Zeuthen DESY-IfH, 15735 Zeuthen, Germany.