From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9654 invoked from network); 6 Dec 1996 03:36:45 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by coral.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Dec 1996 03:36:45 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA24614; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 22:31:29 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 22:24:33 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199612060329.MAA26507@mother.olu.info.waseda.ac.jp> To: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: zsh on NT? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Dec 1996 13:38:43 EST." <199612051838.NAA21259@redwood.skiles.gatech.edu> From: kent@muraoka.info.waseda.ac.jp (TAMURA Kent) Date: Fri, 06 Dec 1996 12:26:50 +0900 Sender: kent@olu.info.waseda.ac.jp Resent-Message-ID: <"hLBKY.0.5-5.n7vfo"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/540 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu > clean). As it stands, I haven't heard of anyone porting zsh to > a non-Unix box. ONO Hideki ported zsh-2.5.03 to Human68k, which is DOS-like OS on SHARP X68000(personal computer sold in Japan). I ported zsh-2.5.03 to OS/2. This port was based on patches for Human68k. And I'm working to port zsh-3.0 to OS/2. -- TAMURA Kent @ WASEDA Univ., Tokyo, Japan