From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3636 invoked from network); 2 Jan 1997 21:41:34 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by coral.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 2 Jan 1997 21:41:34 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA08797; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 16:26:24 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 15:56:02 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199701022055.PAA02880@redwood.skiles.gatech.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: luomat@peak.org cc: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: can I "strip" 3.0.2? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 Jan 1997 14:53:39 EST." <199701021953.OAA14319@nerc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 15:55:56 -0500 From: Richard Coleman Resent-Message-ID: <"ajZSu.0.D-1.X32po"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/575 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu > > I am guessing that I can, and save a little space: > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 luomat wheel 303104 Jan 2 14:52 zsh* > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 509420 Jan 2 13:49 zsh-3.0.2* > > where the first is the same as the second, except stripped. > > Any reason not to do so? Go ahead and strip it. Shouldn't cause any problems... rc