From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3657 invoked from network); 2 Jan 1997 21:52:49 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by coral.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 2 Jan 1997 21:52:49 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA09382; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 16:45:31 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 16:17:06 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199701022117.QAA03127@redwood.skiles.gatech.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: luomat@peak.org Cc: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: can I "strip" 3.0.2? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 Jan 1997 16:00:21 EST." <199701022100.NAA12928@PEAK.ORG> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 16:17:01 -0500 From: Richard Coleman Resent-Message-ID: <"Gt_eJ3.0.-52.HN2po"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/578 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu > Responding To: Richard Coleman > Original Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 15:55:56 -0500 > Message-ID: <199701022055.PAA02880@redwood.skiles.gatech.edu> > > > Go ahead and strip it. Shouldn't cause any problems... > > I read that the next release will support some sort of loadable > bundles, will that mean stripping will be better left undone then? Hmm... not sure about that one... Zoltan? rc