From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-request@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu>
Received: (qmail 3827 invoked from network); 3 Jan 1997 00:33:25 -0000
Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50)
  by coral.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 3 Jan 1997 00:33:25 -0000
Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA12580; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 19:34:46 -0500 (EST)
Resent-Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 19:12:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Zoltan Hidvegi <hzoli@cs.elte.hu>
Message-Id: <199701022251.XAA00294@hzoli.ppp.cs.elte.hu>
Subject: Re: can I "strip" 3.0.2?
To: luomat@peak.org
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 23:51:39 +0100 (MET)
Cc: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu
In-Reply-To: <199701022100.NAA12928@PEAK.ORG> from Timothy J Luoma at "Jan 2, 97 04:00:21 pm"
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL17 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"vPrDZ2.0.k_2.7y4po"@euclid>
Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-users@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/579
X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu

> I read that the next release will support some sort of loadable  
> bundles, will that mean stripping will be better left undone then?

It depends on the binary format.  For example elf binaries (which is the
standard binary format on SVR4, Solaris and Linux) can be stripped
whithout loosing dynamic loading capabilities.  On the other hand SunOS 4
cannot export symbols to modules if binaries are stripped.  But that's only
for zsh-3.1.

Zoltan