From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7230 invoked from network); 9 Aug 1997 14:33:37 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 9 Aug 1997 14:33:37 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA23629; Sat, 9 Aug 1997 10:19:37 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 10:19:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 23:23:16 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199708091423.XAA08816@momonga.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp> X-Mailer: cmail [version 2.59.11] References: <199708091340.OAA09772@tower.york.ac.uk> From: gau@mmm.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (OKANO Dai) To: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu In-reply-to: Wez Furlong's message of "Sat, 9 Aug 1997 14:40:42 +0100" <199708091340.OAA09772@tower.york.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Zsh for Win95 ? Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Resent-Message-ID: <"WBW2R1.0.Om5.Mn7xp"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/969 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Hi, You'll find zsh for Win95/NT in ftp://ftp.blarg.net:/users/amol/zsh/ . I've once tried them on my Win95 of Japanese version. Forgot my reason why I've thrown away, but later someone on this list said they work well. Maybe the trouble I had was something specific with Japanese environment or maybe had been improved as the revison number increased. Tell me how good it was when you have tested. -- OKANO Dai : gau@mmm.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp