From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15738 invoked from network); 29 Nov 1997 22:35:08 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 Nov 1997 22:35:08 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA28138; Sat, 29 Nov 1997 17:20:22 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Nov 1997 17:20:06 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <19971129221959.47542@bach.memex.co.uk> Date: Sat, 29 Nov 1997 22:19:59 +0000 From: Stephen Marley To: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: Zsh 3.0.5 problem. References: <19971129210956.40010@bach.memex.co.uk> <971129141131.ZM5305@candle.brasslantern.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85e In-Reply-To: <971129141131.ZM5305@candle.brasslantern.com>; from Bart Schaefer on Sat, Nov 29, 1997 at 02:11:31PM -0800 Resent-Message-ID: <"ch3BN3.0.ws6.LK9Wq"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1169 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Quoting Bart Schaefer (schaefer@brasslantern.com): > I had that problem for a while with one of the pre-releases, but it turned > out to be a problem with the way I'd merged a local patch into the new > version. Are you running a completely unmodified 3.0.5? Yup - straight out of the box. > > Run something like this in place of your regular xterm: > > xterm -ls -e zsh -c "zsh -l ; sleep 10000" I'll give it a whirl and post to the list when/if it happens again. Thanks. -- stephen@memex.com