From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18587 invoked from network); 20 Jan 1998 13:12:56 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 20 Jan 1998 13:12:56 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA15749; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 08:08:01 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 08:07:40 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <19980120140903.64403@ens-lyon.fr> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 14:09:03 +0100 From: Vincent Lefevre To: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: problems with stderr Mail-Followup-To: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88.6 In-Reply-To: ; from "Niall Smart" on Tue, Jan 20, 1998 at 12:02:19 X-Mailer-Info: http://www.ens-lyon.fr/~vlefevre/mutt_eng.html Resent-Message-ID: <"ldmyk2.0.Rr3.Q6Anq"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1242 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Tue, Jan 20, 1998 at 12:02:19 +0000, Niall Smart wrote: > I've noticed the following behaviour on zsh 3.1.2, is it a known bug? > > [njs3@oak73 ~]$ echo -n foobar>&2 > [njs3@oak73 ~]$ > > What I expected is: > > [njs3@oak73 ~]$ echo -n foobar>&2 > foobar[njs3@oak73 ~]$ Have you tried "unsetopt PROMPT_CR"? -- Vincent Lefevre | Acorn Risc PC, StrongARM @ 202MHz WWW: http://www.ens-lyon.fr/~vlefevre/ | 20+2MB RAM, Eagle M2, TV + Teletext PhD st. in Computer Science, 2nd year | Apple CD-300, SyQuest 270MB (SCSI) -----------------------------------------------------------------------------