From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15624 invoked from network); 5 Jun 1998 08:32:07 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 5 Jun 1998 08:32:07 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA16610; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 04:19:14 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 04:19:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Zefram Message-Id: <199806050819.JAA20562@taos.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: 3.1.4: Somebody please explain BARE_GLOB_QUAL To: schaefer@brasslantern.com (Bart Schaefer) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 09:19:52 +0100 (BST) Cc: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: <980604120312.ZM14366@candle.brasslantern.com> from "Bart Schaefer" at Jun 4, 98 12:03:12 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"hOGXy3.0.v24.qdwTr"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1569 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Bart Schaefer wrote: >More specifically, explain what happens when it is -not- set. Are glob >qualifiers completely disabled in that case? At the moment, yes. My intention is that eventually we will have some other, unambiguous, glob qualifier syntax, which will be available regardless of BARE_GLOB_QUAL. (We need the capability to disable the current qualifier syntax in order to fully emulate ksh glob syntax.) -zefram