From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22482 invoked from network); 19 Aug 1998 20:12:26 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 19 Aug 1998 20:12:26 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id PAA12564; Wed, 19 Aug 1998 15:55:58 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 15:55:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19980819215829.A13376@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 21:58:29 +0200 From: Roland Jesse To: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: zsh - new user with questions References: <980819121832.ZM11783@candle.brasslantern.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.2i In-Reply-To: <980819121832.ZM11783@candle.brasslantern.com>; from Bart Schaefer on Wed, Aug 19, 1998 at 12:18:31PM -0700 Resent-Message-ID: <"mNdVt1.0.l33.8tosr"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1742 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Bart Schaefer wrote: > The actual _access_ to the file still has to use its "real" name. Now it's getting confusing. If the completion tells me a different file name than the one acutally stored in the file system, I can easily imagine cases in which I am not sure what the command, the completion is used for, is going to do. Regards, Roland