From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16992 invoked from network); 1 Jun 1999 14:46:37 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Jun 1999 14:46:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 8883 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 1999 14:46:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 2354 Received: (qmail 8876 invoked from network); 1 Jun 1999 14:46:05 -0000 Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 09:43:20 -0500 From: "Larry P. Schrof" To: Bart Schaefer Cc: Scott RoLanD , zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: Problem with flow control in screen Message-ID: <19990601094319.A28304@lyric.cig.mot.com> References: <19990511185959.A27469@chat.net> <990531040755.ZM983@candle.brasslantern.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: <990531040755.ZM983@candle.brasslantern.com>; from Bart Schaefer on Mon, May 31, 1999 at 04:07:55AM +0000 It may or may not matter, but hearing 'mutt' and 'less' in the same sentence reminds me they both support S-Lang. > I have no idea why running mutt, less, etc. would make any difference, > unless maybe they're aliases that use screen to create new windows. > > -- > Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises > http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com