From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5927 invoked from network); 1 Sep 1999 12:34:12 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Sep 1999 12:34:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 19905 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 1999 12:33:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 2547 Received: (qmail 19898 invoked from network); 1 Sep 1999 12:33:34 -0000 Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 08:33:32 -0400 From: Gabor To: zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCHES Message-ID: <19990901083332.A20771@vmunix.com> References: <199909010957.LAA00172@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.7i In-Reply-To: <199909010957.LAA00172@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.7-STABLE i386 On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 11:57:36AM +0200, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: # # Ollivier Robert wrote: # # > According to Gabor: # > > I was wondering how a user of zsh stays on top of patches? I don't # > > see any on ftp.zsh.org. Where are they? # > # > You read zsh-workers then it goes from impossible to very hard. There were # > more than 60 patches to go from 3.1.6-pws-1 to 3.1.6-pws-2 :) # > # > You'll find them in the mailing-lists archives at # # Or have a look at http://www.ifh.de/~pws/computing/ from time to time # (that's the place where interims releases are currently showing up). I found it yesterday. :) It seems to fix the bugs I reported. Namely the completion in $(< and the hash problem when ksharrays is set. Just curious here. Why isn't ksharrays the default? Also, what is the current goal with regard to development? Is zsh going to move towards more ksh93 compliance? It sure would be nice. :) Things like read -tn would be nice.