From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-2705-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 11857 invoked from network); 26 Oct 1999 15:40:17 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 26 Oct 1999 15:40:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 1353 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 1999 15:39:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 2705
Received: (qmail 1346 invoked from network); 26 Oct 1999 15:39:16 -0000
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 10:46:11 -0400
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
To: Wolfgang Hukriede <whukriede@ifm.uni-kiel.de>
Cc: zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk
Subject: Re: &| vs &! (Was: logout and nohup)
Message-ID: <19991026104611.A10098@dman.com>
References: <199910261354.PAA08218@sally.ifm.uni-kiel.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre4i
In-Reply-To: <199910261354.PAA08218@sally.ifm.uni-kiel.de>; from whukriede@ifm.uni-kiel.de on Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 03:54:55PM +0200

> The man page lists &| and &! as not putting a job into the job table.
> It doesn't become clear to me though, whether that's their only
> difference compared to & and whether they're totally synonymous or
> not. Thanks and regargs, Wolfgang.

They're lexically identical.