From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18359 invoked from network); 3 Nov 1999 08:13:22 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 3 Nov 1999 08:13:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 5819 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 1999 08:13:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 2716 Received: (qmail 5812 invoked from network); 3 Nov 1999 08:13:06 -0000 Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 09:13:05 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199911030813.JAA00445@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Tue, 2 Nov 1999 17:53:19 +0000 Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: NUMERIC_GLOB_SORT wish Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Nov 1, 9:00am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: > } Subject: PATCH: Re: NUMERIC_GLOB_SORT wish > } > } The patch below implements [toggle numeric-glob-sort] for 3.1.6-bart-7 > } [...]. For now I took the letter `n'. This is a bit ugly > } because all other qualifiers that locally set options use upper case > } letters. > > I think it's OK in this case; it's parallel with things like "sort -n" > that use a lower-case `n' for numeric. > > I'm not excited about the suggestion of using `0' (zero) because it's too > easily confused with `O'. That's exactly why I didn't produce a patch until now... Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de